Dreaming to develop a project but the property is classified as agricultural land?
Your dream might only be a few documents away from becoming a reality given the recent amendments on the 2002 Comprehensive Rules on Land Use Conversion by the Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR).
Defining land use conversion
Land use conversion is defined as the act or method of modifying the current physical use of a parcel of agricultural land for either a non-agricultural purpose or the same agricultural use but other than soil cultivation as well as growing of crops and trees as approved by DAR.
However, it is important to note that land use conversion is different from reclassification. Compared to land use conversion, reclassification is the act of specifying the potential of agricultural land to be utilized for non-agricultural purposes. However, this doesn’t automatically allow a landowner to utilize the same agricultural land for different use. A converted land meanwhile gives the landowner an actual right to use a previously classified agricultural land into its converted, now intended use. This is according to DAR’s Section 65 of Republic Act No. 6657, as amended by Executive Order (EO) 129-A, and paragraph (13), Section 3, Title XI of the Revised Administrative Code of 1987, otherwise known as EO No. 292.
Is any agricultural land eligible for land use conversion?
The short answer is no. The long answer, however, is divided into three categories: convertible lands, non-negotiable areas for conversion and highly restricted areas for conversion.
Agricultural lands eligible for conversion should be reclassified into non-agricultural uses such as commercial, industrial and residential through the local government unit or via a Presidential Proclamation, according to RA No. 6657 effective on June 15, 1988. For agricultural lands reclassified before June 15, 1988, however, DAR’s guidelines on securing an exemption clearance should apply.
Areas non-negotiable for conversion can be further subdivided into two categories. First are agricultural lands classified under the National Integrated Protected Areas System (NIPAS) as determined by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). The second category includes irrigated, irrigable land and agricultural lands with existing irrigation facilities as delineated by the National Irrigation Administration (NIA).
Lastly, areas highly restrictive for conversion include the following: irrigable lands with firm funding commitment, but are not covered by irrigation projects; agro-industrial croplands; highlands or areas with elevations of 500 meters and above exhibiting potential for growing high-value or semi-temperate crops; lands with notice of land valuation and acquisition, and; lands located within Environmentally Critical Areas (ECA) or involved with Environmentally Critical Projects (ECP).
Except for authorized housing projects, agricultural lands highly restrictive for conversion and with areas over five hectares should undergo deliberations by the Presidential Agrarian Reform Council (PARC) Land Use Technical Committee (PLUTC).
Streamlined processes
Through its Administrative Order (AO) No. 1, Series of 2019, the department has now revised its guidelines and methods aimed at streamlining the long process of land use conversion in the Philippines. This was done by amending specific provisions on AO No. 1, Series of 2002 in hopes of hastening the process of land conversion cases.
To start, only the landowner or his/her duly authorized representative can apply for land use conversion and submit all supporting documents. However, agricultural lands for conversion which were acquired under RA 6657 would only be allowed if the applicant is also the agrarian reform beneficiary. The beneficiary should likewise pay for the full price of the land.
To achieve faster processing, the latest guidelines also eliminated some requirements for land use conversion, such as the Department of Agriculture (DA) Certificate; the DENR’s Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC), on certain conditions, and; a Conversion Grant for areas to be used as resettlement or relocation sites for displaced communities after a nationally declared calamity, provided that these are not part of the Strategic Agriculture and Fisheries Development Zones (SAFDZ).
With the latest amendments, electronic copies of land titles are now being accepted to confirm landholding and its registered owner(s) in place of certified true copies. However, the following localities are not covered by this specific amendment: Basilan (Isabela); Batanes (Basco); Cadiz City; Cagayan (Tuao); Dapitan City; Negros Occidental; Province of Tawi-Tawi (Bongao); Silay City and; Sulu (Jolo).
Towards smoother public transactions
Simplifying major laws such as the 2002 Comprehensive Rules on Land Use Conversion is an excellent executive method, thanks to the department’s initiative. However, this isn’t merely for avoiding additional yet unnecessary fees in securing individual clearances. Instead, amendments of similar goals will allow the country to develop a comprehensive land policy framework that utilizes agricultural development towards sustainable economic growth.
The author is the principal architect of Fulgar Architects, an architectural firm helping local and international property developers get into unique and diversified planning and design specialties for real estate, hotels, condominiums, commercial and mixed-use township developments with a pursuit for the meta-modern in the next Philippine architecture
Article and Photo originally posted by Inquirer last February 20, 2021 3:50am and written by Ar. John Ian Lee Fulgar.
About Post Author
More Stories
Banks’ total assets up at P26.2 trillion end-June
Lamudi sees heightened developer confidence with rise in ad spending
Phase 1 of PHINMA’s Bacolod township to finish by next year